AMD Bulldozer Docking performance


Advanced search

Message boards : Number crunching : AMD Bulldozer Docking performance

Sort
Author Message
Profile TheFiend

Joined: Apr 7 09
Posts: 70
ID: 9482
Credit: 20,705,527
RAC: 0
Message 6509 - Posted 17 Nov 2011 13:30:13 UTC

Any got a Bulldozer yet?

Interested in how they perform on Docking tasks compared to Phenom II's.

ID: 6509 | Rating: 0 | rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive
P . P . L .
Avatar

Joined: Oct 20 08
Posts: 69
ID: 2725
Credit: 1,000,979
RAC: 0
Message 6510 - Posted 17 Nov 2011 20:44:48 UTC
Last modified: 17 Nov 2011 21:00:55 UTC

Hi.

I don't have one but did see a 8120 running a couple of weeks ago and it was

slower by about an hour per task then my 1055t running stock, so i don't think

i'll be getting one unless they can get them running a lot better.

ps/ i'll see if i can find it again & link it.

Found it FX 8120
____________


ID: 6510 | Rating: 0 | rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive
Profile TheFiend

Joined: Apr 7 09
Posts: 70
ID: 9482
Credit: 20,705,527
RAC: 0
Message 6511 - Posted 18 Nov 2011 23:03:23 UTC - in response to Message ID 6510 .

Hi.

I don't have one but did see a 8120 running a couple of weeks ago and it was

slower by about an hour per task then my 1055t running stock, so i don't think

i'll be getting one unless they can get them running a lot better.

ps/ i'll see if i can find it again & link it.

Found it FX 8120


Thanks for that!!!

15700 sec per unit..... that is seriously slow. My slightly souped up 1055T Can crunch one in 9100....

My mind's made up.... I'm going for a 1090T instead before they get killed off.
ID: 6511 | Rating: 0 | rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive
P . P . L .
Avatar

Joined: Oct 20 08
Posts: 69
ID: 2725
Credit: 1,000,979
RAC: 0
Message 6512 - Posted 22 Nov 2011 7:52:13 UTC

Hi.

I found a 8150 running on P.O.E.M. looks to be stock clocked i believe that's

3.6Ghz, & the O.S. is liunx r.c. so that takes windows out of the equation.
( mine is Ubuntu 10.04lts x64 )

So i've let my 1055T get some tasks( the same type ) out of interest to see if there is much difference, will update tomorrow.





____________


ID: 6512 | Rating: 0 | rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive
P . P . L .
Avatar

Joined: Oct 20 08
Posts: 69
ID: 2725
Credit: 1,000,979
RAC: 0
Message 6513 - Posted 22 Nov 2011 21:01:11 UTC
Last modified: 22 Nov 2011 21:17:47 UTC

Hi.

Ran some POEM over night here's the average per task.

poempp_barrelmutations__4,770 sec - my 1055T @ 2.8Ghz


poempp_barrelmutations__4,920 sec - 8150 @ 3.6Ghz - guessing here.

Rig link

Closer then the 8120 is on here but is still slower! disappointing.
____________


ID: 6513 | Rating: 0 | rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive
Profile TheFiend

Joined: Apr 7 09
Posts: 70
ID: 9482
Credit: 20,705,527
RAC: 0
Message 6514 - Posted 23 Nov 2011 8:55:30 UTC

Well, my 1090T should be here today and I should be able to get it running at 4GHz with a bit of luck.

Looks like I'll be sticking with my Phenom II's for quite a while.....

ID: 6514 | Rating: 0 | rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive
Profile TheFiend

Joined: Apr 7 09
Posts: 70
ID: 9482
Credit: 20,705,527
RAC: 0
Message 6520 - Posted 5 Dec 2011 21:05:47 UTC - in response to Message ID 6511 .

Hi.

I don't have one but did see a 8120 running a couple of weeks ago and it was

slower by about an hour per task then my 1055t running stock, so i don't think

i'll be getting one unless they can get them running a lot better.

ps/ i'll see if i can find it again & link it.

Found it FX 8120


Thanks for that!!!

15700 sec per unit..... that is seriously slow. My slightly souped up 1055T Can crunch one in 9100....

My mind's made up.... I'm going for a 1090T instead before they get killed off.


Glad I went for the 1090T.... averaging 8200 seconds per WU.
ID: 6520 | Rating: 0 | rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive
Profile TheFiend

Joined: Apr 7 09
Posts: 70
ID: 9482
Credit: 20,705,527
RAC: 0
Message 6585 - Posted 9 Mar 2012 7:53:42 UTC
Last modified: 9 Mar 2012 8:10:46 UTC

Finally found one doing Docking.

Host 107101

Approx 13850 seconds per core per WU for an FX 8150.

ID: 6585 | Rating: 0 | rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive
MaW

Joined: Jan 26 11
Posts: 17
ID: 37208
Credit: 114,943
RAC: 0
Message 6588 - Posted 10 Mar 2012 13:19:50 UTC

Now that's horrible o.O It's far worse even than an Athlon II, which at 3.1GHz crunches a WU in roughly 3 hours. And less than an hour better than my laptop C2D @1.8GHz, which needs aout 5 hours.

ID: 6588 | Rating: 0 | rate: Rate + / Rate - Report as offensive

Message boards : Number crunching : AMD Bulldozer Docking performance

Database Error
: The MySQL server is running with the --read-only option so it cannot execute this statement 
array(3) {
  [0]=>
  array(7) {
    ["file"]=>
    string(47) "/boinc/projects/docking/html_v2/inc/db_conn.inc"
    ["line"]=>
    int(97)
    ["function"]=>
    string(8) "do_query"
    ["class"]=>
    string(6) "DbConn"
    ["object"]=>
    object(DbConn)#14 (2) {
      ["db_conn"]=>
      resource(66) of type (mysql link persistent)
      ["db_name"]=>
      string(7) "docking"
    }
    ["type"]=>
    string(2) "->"
    ["args"]=>
    array(1) {
      [0]=>
      &string(51) "update DBNAME.thread set views=views+1 where id=630"
    }
  }
  [1]=>
  array(7) {
    ["file"]=>
    string(48) "/boinc/projects/docking/html_v2/inc/forum_db.inc"
    ["line"]=>
    int(60)
    ["function"]=>
    string(6) "update"
    ["class"]=>
    string(6) "DbConn"
    ["object"]=>
    object(DbConn)#14 (2) {
      ["db_conn"]=>
      resource(66) of type (mysql link persistent)
      ["db_name"]=>
      string(7) "docking"
    }
    ["type"]=>
    string(2) "->"
    ["args"]=>
    array(3) {
      [0]=>
      object(BoincThread)#3 (16) {
        ["id"]=>
        string(3) "630"
        ["forum"]=>
        string(1) "2"
        ["owner"]=>
        string(4) "9482"
        ["status"]=>
        string(1) "0"
        ["title"]=>
        string(33) "AMD Bulldozer Docking performance"
        ["timestamp"]=>
        string(10) "1331385590"
        ["views"]=>
        string(3) "322"
        ["replies"]=>
        string(1) "8"
        ["activity"]=>
        string(19) "3.8479740181553e-45"
        ["sufferers"]=>
        string(1) "0"
        ["score"]=>
        string(1) "0"
        ["votes"]=>
        string(1) "0"
        ["create_time"]=>
        string(10) "1321536613"
        ["hidden"]=>
        string(1) "0"
        ["sticky"]=>
        string(1) "0"
        ["locked"]=>
        string(1) "0"
      }
      [1]=>
      &string(6) "thread"
      [2]=>
      &string(13) "views=views+1"
    }
  }
  [2]=>
  array(7) {
    ["file"]=>
    string(63) "/boinc/projects/docking/html_v2/user/community/forum/thread.php"
    ["line"]=>
    int(184)
    ["function"]=>
    string(6) "update"
    ["class"]=>
    string(11) "BoincThread"
    ["object"]=>
    object(BoincThread)#3 (16) {
      ["id"]=>
      string(3) "630"
      ["forum"]=>
      string(1) "2"
      ["owner"]=>
      string(4) "9482"
      ["status"]=>
      string(1) "0"
      ["title"]=>
      string(33) "AMD Bulldozer Docking performance"
      ["timestamp"]=>
      string(10) "1331385590"
      ["views"]=>
      string(3) "322"
      ["replies"]=>
      string(1) "8"
      ["activity"]=>
      string(19) "3.8479740181553e-45"
      ["sufferers"]=>
      string(1) "0"
      ["score"]=>
      string(1) "0"
      ["votes"]=>
      string(1) "0"
      ["create_time"]=>
      string(10) "1321536613"
      ["hidden"]=>
      string(1) "0"
      ["sticky"]=>
      string(1) "0"
      ["locked"]=>
      string(1) "0"
    }
    ["type"]=>
    string(2) "->"
    ["args"]=>
    array(1) {
      [0]=>
      &string(13) "views=views+1"
    }
  }
}
query: update docking.thread set views=views+1 where id=630