Test WUs
Message boards : Number crunching : Test WUs
| Author | Message | |
|---|---|---|
|
Weee! What HR class were they for? I can't get them with my macs or windows boxes.
|
||
ID:
3734 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
Andre Kerstens
Forum moderator Project tester Volunteer tester 
Joined: Sep 11 06 Posts: 749 ID: 1 Credit: 15,199 RAC: 0 |
||
|
Weee! What HR class were they for? I can't get them with my macs or windows boxes. They were gone in a second :-) Mostly Windows XP boxes as far as I can see.... ____________ D@H the greatest project in the world... a while from now! |
||
|
ID:
3735 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Weee! What HR class were they for? I can't get them with my macs or windows boxes. I was getting the "there was work, but it was committed to other platforms" on both my macs and my XP machines. ____________ Dublin, CA Team SETI.USA |
||
|
ID:
3738 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Andre Kerstens
Forum moderator Project tester Volunteer tester
Joined: Sep 11 06 Posts: 749 ID: 1 Credit: 15,199 RAC: 0 |
||
|
Also noticed we are getting lots of download errors in the log. Most results seem to fail :-(
Weee! What HR class were they for? I can't get them with my macs or windows boxes. ____________ D@H the greatest project in the world... a while from now! |
||
|
ID:
3740 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Also noticed we are getting lots of download errors in the log. Most results seem to fail :-( Yes!! I'll finally be able to merge some duplicate hosts. Cool beans. ____________ Dublin, CA Team SETI.USA |
||
|
ID:
3743 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
FYI , I can't download wu's : (Boinc versions : 5.8.16 & 5.10.7)
|
||
|
ID:
3744 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Andre Kerstens
Forum moderator Project tester Volunteer tester
Joined: Sep 11 06 Posts: 749 ID: 1 Credit: 15,199 RAC: 0 |
||
|
We'll hopefully fix all of these problems in the weekend.
|
||
|
ID:
3747 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Abel
Forum moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester 
Joined: Sep 15 06 Posts: 30 ID: 108 Credit: 167,489 RAC: 0 |
||
|
Zombie67 and j2satx, we just sent out some new wus and we saw that you got them. Please let us know it it worked on your pcs without any errors. Thanks. |
||
|
ID:
3758 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Zombie67 and j2satx, we just sent out some new wus and we saw that you got them. Please let us know it it worked on your pcs without any errors. Thanks. 1st: Thanks for upgrading the server! I have now successfully merged my duplicate machines! 2nd: I got two tasks: 82 failed downloading: <core_client_version>5.10.41</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> app_version download error: couldn't get input files: <file_xfer_error> <file_name>charmm_5.7_windows_x86_64</file_name> <error_code>-224</error_code> <error_message>file not found</error_message> </file_xfer_error> </message> ]]> 86 seems to be stuck downloading. I am getting the error message "Temporarily failed download of charmm_5.7_windows_x86_64: File not found" This is an XP64 machine, with 5.10.13. It should be getting the 32 bit app if a 64 bit app is not available. Do you want me to cancel it? ____________ Dublin, CA Team SETI.USA |
||
|
ID:
3759 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Abel
Forum moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester
Joined: Sep 15 06 Posts: 30 ID: 108 Credit: 167,489 RAC: 0 |
||
|
Zombie67 and j2satx, we just sent out some new wus and we saw that you got them. Please let us know it it worked on your pcs without any errors. Thanks. Yeah, go ahead and cancel it. |
||
|
ID:
3760 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Yeah, go ahead and cancel it. Done ____________ Dublin, CA Team SETI.USA |
||
|
ID:
3761 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Zombie67 and j2satx, we just sent out some new wus and we saw that you got them. Please let us know it it worked on your pcs without any errors. Thanks. I don't find any on my machines. Which computer(s) got a WU? edit: never mind, found the two that failed downloading. Don't be wimpy, throw a thousand over the fence instead of ten.......LOL |
||
|
ID:
3762 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Download error on this WU -
____________ 
|
||
|
ID:
3763 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Andre Kerstens
Forum moderator Project tester Volunteer tester
Joined: Sep 11 06 Posts: 749 ID: 1 Credit: 15,199 RAC: 0 |
||
|
OK. We've upgraded the version number of all apps to 5.8 (same app as 5.7) to see if it is a problem with the generation and things are still pointing to utep. I've seen that at least zombie67 got a WU again. Let us know if this one downloads...
|
||
|
ID:
3768 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
OK. We've upgraded the version number of all apps to 5.8 (same app as 5.7) to see if it is a problem with the generation and things are still pointing to utep. I've seen that at least zombie67 got a WU again. Let us know if this one downloads... It D/L successfully, and is crunching away on my XP64 machine. Fingers crossed! Edit: Ding! Success and credits issued! http://docking.cis.udel.edu/workunit.php?wuid=12 Question: Is the project exporting stats yet? ____________ Dublin, CA Team SETI.USA |
||
|
ID:
3775 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Can I have some too for my new core2duo? *grin*
|
||
|
ID:
3777 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
suguruhirahara
Forum moderator Volunteer tester 
Joined: Sep 13 06 Posts: 282 ID: 15 Credit: 56,614 RAC: 0 |
||
|
I got several workunits. No issues on my host so far.
|
||
|
ID:
3787 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
David Ball
Forum moderator Volunteer tester 
Joined: Sep 18 06 Posts: 274 ID: 115 Credit: 1,634,401 RAC: 0 |
||
|
I've gotten WU's for XP, Vista, Ubuntu, and Centos with no problems so far. I sure am glad to see docking back :D
|
||
|
ID:
3789 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Got a couple that gave immediate error on 64-bit Ubuntu (Intel). I'll look for the cause.
|
||
|
ID:
3791 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Hello!
|
||
|
ID:
3793 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Got one on 64-bit Ubuntu (AMD) that errored.
|
||
|
ID:
3794 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Just picked up 4 wu's on my Vista host.
|
||
|
ID:
3795 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
|
||
|
ID:
3797 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Hi,
|
||
|
ID:
3804 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
It looks good, but application running on Mac-intel seems needed more CPU time than Windows version. Agreed. The crunch time is over double with OSX/Intel, compared to Windows on a similar processor. OSX w/ Xeon 5365 (3.0ghz) takes 10,500 seconds XP32 w/ Xeon 5355 (2.66ghz) takes 5,000 seconds The faster Mac is over twice as slow, which is very odd. On windows, old legacy processors must be supported, which means you can't take advantage of things like SSE/2/3. But with OSX/Intel, there is no need for legacy support. The oldest processors support at least SSE3. So the OSX app could be written to take advantage of those things. So it should be at least as fast as the Win app, if not faster. ____________ Dublin, CA Team SETI.USA |
||
|
ID:
3808 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Andre Kerstens
Forum moderator Project tester Volunteer tester
Joined: Sep 11 06 Posts: 749 ID: 1 Credit: 15,199 RAC: 0 |
||
|
All,
It looks good, but application running on Mac-intel seems needed more CPU time than Windows version. ____________ D@H the greatest project in the world... a while from now! |
||
|
ID:
3811 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
I am happy to see WUs again.
|
||
|
ID:
3812 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Thanks for the work units, unfortunately they are appear to be faulty.
|
||
|
ID:
3821 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Abel
Forum moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester
Joined: Sep 15 06 Posts: 30 ID: 108 Credit: 167,489 RAC: 0 |
||
|
Thanks for the work units, unfortunately they are appear to be faulty. BOINC changed the way HR is specified in the config.xml file. We'll have to change it and restart the server. The other stuff we will have to trouble shoot. We'll keep you posted. ____________ Mmmmm, doughnut... |
||
|
ID:
3823 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
My G5 has crunched three tasks without apparent problems, but I notice none of my quorum partners are even Macs, let alone PPC. Will these results be possible to validate without HR, or should I mentally write them off now to avoid future disappointment?
|
||
|
ID:
3829 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
My G5 has crunched three tasks without apparent problems, but I notice none of my quorum partners are even Macs, let alone PPC. Will these results be possible to validate without HR, or should I mentally write them off now to avoid future disappointment? I would go with the latter, and then be pleasantly surprised if the former happens. ____________ Dublin, CA Team SETI.USA |
||
|
ID:
3830 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
suguruhirahara
Forum moderator Volunteer tester
Joined: Sep 13 06 Posts: 282 ID: 15 Credit: 56,614 RAC: 0 |
||
|
My G5 has crunched three tasks without apparent problems, but I notice none of my quorum partners are even Macs, let alone PPC. Will these results be possible to validate without HR, or should I mentally write them off now to avoid future disappointment? I assume the number of Mac/PPC is in this phase for the project very small (it was so even when the project was active in the last year). So perhaps what you can do now is just to wait for other hosts, which belong to the class of Mac/PPC. After participants come back to the project there shall be a possibility that your task is validated. It's of course welcomed if you would invite someone who has the same kind of machine to join this project or if you have other Macs ;-) thanks, suguruhirahara ____________ 
I'm a volunteer participant; my views are not necessarily those of Docking@Home or its participating institutions. |
||
|
ID:
3831 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
It's of course welcomed if you would invite someone who has the same kind of machine to join this project or if you have other Macs ;-) I have 4 PPC macs attached. But the odds of them matching up without HR implemented is too small. ____________ Dublin, CA Team SETI.USA |
||
|
ID:
3833 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
I am only going to try and process the work units for the purpose of checking all is working with the system.
|
||
|
ID:
3835 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Abel
Forum moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester
Joined: Sep 15 06 Posts: 30 ID: 108 Credit: 167,489 RAC: 0 |
||
|
I am only going to try and process the work units for the purpose of checking all is working with the system. Thanks for the conviction Conan :-) At first I had thought the HR problem was just a matter of restarting the server with the new configuration file, unfortunately it's not gonna be that easy. When we updated to the new version of BOINC there where things on our project specific code that we needed to change also. We are working on that and we'll get HR working ASAP. I'm not to sure how the credits are going to play out this time, but feel free to cancel any work units you don't think will get credit, or be tough like Conan and crunch them anyway. ____________ Mmmmm, doughnut... |
||
|
ID:
3836 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
I am only going to try and process the work units for the purpose of checking all is working with the system. Well Abel you leave me with no choice do you? I will have to crunch them. ____________ 
|
||
|
ID:
3837 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
I assume the number of Mac/PPC is in this phase for the project very small (it was so even when the project was active in the last year). So perhaps what you can do now is just to wait for other hosts, which belong to the class of Mac/PPC. After participants come back to the project there shall be a possibility that your task is validated. The problem isn’t waiting for partners, which I don’t mind much—and which didn’t seem to be an issue last year, anyway—it’s getting partners who are unlikely (in proportion to the need for HR here, I guess) to produce matching results. As Zombie67 said, without HR the odds against a quorum of PPC Macs forming will be very long. It's of course welcomed if you would invite someone who has the same kind of machine to join this project or if you have other Macs ;-) Most of my other hosts are at work, and I have a policy not to run test projects on servers, colleagues’ workstations, or other systems I can’t easily keep an eye on. I do have a couple of old G4s available, but charmm doesn’t seem to like them. :( Anyway, I think I’ll set my G5 to NNT for now, and keep an eye out for news. |
||
|
ID:
3846 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Anyway, I think I’ll set my G5 to NNT for now, and keep an eye out for news. I am doing the same thing. Until news of a change/fix/testing of HR policy, my macs (both kinds) are sitting on the sidelines. ____________ Dublin, CA Team SETI.USA |
||
|
ID:
3852 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Results in progress 0 Time for some new...? I'm up for it... maybe this time I can clear the 20k hurdle. ;-) ____________ 
|
||
|
ID:
3885 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Any update?
|
||
|
ID:
3899 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
suguruhirahara
Forum moderator Volunteer tester
Joined: Sep 13 06 Posts: 282 ID: 15 Credit: 56,614 RAC: 0 |
||
|
Any update? Unfortunately it seems that the team has problems which they don't solve yet. I'm waiting for works, too:) suguruhirahara ____________
I'm a volunteer participant; my views are not necessarily those of Docking@Home or its participating institutions. |
||
|
ID:
3900 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
SIMAP is issuing work in about an hours time if you want something to turn over while you wait.
|
||
|
ID:
3902 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Andre Kerstens
Forum moderator Project tester Volunteer tester
Joined: Sep 11 06 Posts: 749 ID: 1 Credit: 15,199 RAC: 0 |
||
|
Just answered
this
in another thread.
|
||
|
ID:
3911 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Just had this error on one of the new test
Work Units
|
||
|
ID:
3980 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Just had this error on one of the new test Work Units Sorry I put the WU id in instead of the Result id, should be this Result . Also have had another 2 fail with different error on results 3870 and 3918 . <core_client_version>5.10.21</core_client_version> <![CDATA[ <message> process exited with code 193 (0xc1, -63) </message> <stderr_txt> Calling BOINC init. Starting charmm run (initial or from checkpoint)... SIGSEGV: segmentation violation Stack trace (3 frames): [0x834f896] [0x40000420] [0x82a8178] My first WU on Windows ran for over 2 hours but all since have been less than 20 minutes on both Windows and Linux. ____________
|
||
|
ID:
3990 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Just had this error on one of the new test Work Units OK, I just had another WU fail with the same Segmentation Violation Error as the last two results. On closer inspection I have been teamed up with Darwin/Intel machines (zombie67 I think), so it appears that HR is not working. My currently connected computers are all AMD and I run either Windows or Linux. ____________
|
||
|
ID:
3992 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
At the moment there is 266 work units waiting to be sent, and has been for a few hours.
|
||
|
ID:
3994 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Abel
Forum moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester
Joined: Sep 15 06 Posts: 30 ID: 108 Credit: 167,489 RAC: 0 |
||
|
Looks like we still have some issues to iron out. We are planning to update the version of CHARMM so we are not too worried about the seg fault issue since we already address some of those issues in the update. We just wanted to make sure HR and the screensaver where working. It seems the screensaver is fine but HR is still being difficult. We are working overtime to get it back in business. Thanks for the updates. |
||
|
ID:
3996 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
At the moment there is 266 work units waiting to be sent, and has been for a few hours. Nope. Neither my intel or PPC machines were able to pull them down. And now I am getting this again: Thu Jun 5 07:33:20 2008|Docking@Home|Message from server: No work sent Thu Jun 5 07:33:20 2008|Docking@Home|Message from server: Charmm with screensaver is not available for your type of computer. ____________ Dublin, CA Team SETI.USA |
||
|
ID:
3998 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Hi,
|
||
|
ID:
3999 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Here is the host with the results.
|
||
|
ID:
4000 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
My Intel Mac got one successfull validated WU. Good work ! |
||
|
ID:
4001 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
My Intel Mac got one successfull validated WU. Good work ! Ditto for my G5; subsequent requests for work have apparently been unsuccessful. |
||
|
ID:
4003 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Michela
Forum moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester Project scientist 
Joined: Sep 13 06 Posts: 163 ID: 10 Credit: 97,083 RAC: 0 |
||
|
Hi, we are still submitting few, controlled WUs for crunching.
|
||
|
ID:
4004 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Btw: I've tried Docking on my old (and lame *grin*) PIII 450 Mhz, running under Win2K.
|
||
|
ID:
4006 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
On my
Host 1526
I am showing seven work units, numbers
1887
,
1904
,
1913
,
1920
,
1924
,
1935
,
1940
. I do not have these work units, they downloaded to my computer (well I could locate 4 of them in the logs), and all errored out with the error code 193 (as per my message logs), but none of this information has uploaded to your servers, and you still show them as being 'Pending'.
|
||
|
ID:
4007 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Abel
Forum moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester
Joined: Sep 15 06 Posts: 30 ID: 108 Credit: 167,489 RAC: 0 |
||
|
On my Host 1526 I am showing seven work units, numbers 1887 , 1904 , 1913 , 1920 , 1924 , 1935 , 1940 . I do not have these work units, they downloaded to my computer (well I could locate 4 of them in the logs), and all errored out with the error code 193 (as per my message logs), but none of this information has uploaded to your servers, and you still show them as being 'Pending'. Thanks for the updates on the buggy WUs. As far as the points go, somehow they are not being normalized, we will take a look at this ASAP. |
||
|
ID:
4008 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Abel
Forum moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester
Joined: Sep 15 06 Posts: 30 ID: 108 Credit: 167,489 RAC: 0 |
||
|
Btw: I've tried Docking on my old (and lame *grin*) PIII 450 Mhz, running under Win2K. Has to be a divergency issue. May need to put your PIII in another HR class. We will look into it. |
||
|
ID:
4009 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
I just saw
one WU
on my account, that was not on my puter. I seem to have found the messages for this ine (I'm UTC+2 at the moment, and I think the times on the server are UTC)
Fr 06 Jun 2008 16:14:30 CEST|Docking@Home|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 24417 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks
Fr 06 Jun 2008 16:14:35 CEST|Docking@Home|Scheduler request succeeded: got 1 new tasks Fr 06 Jun 2008 16:14:37 CEST|Docking@Home|Started download of 1tng_mod0011s_948_74060.inp Fr 06 Jun 2008 16:14:41 CEST|Docking@Home|Finished download of 1tng_mod0011s_948_74060.inp Fr 06 Jun 2008 16:14:42 CEST|Docking@Home|Starting logo.jpg Fr 06 Jun 2008 16:14:42 CEST|Docking@Home|Starting task logo.jpg using charmmscreen version 700 Fr 06 Jun 2008 16:19:32 CEST|Docking@Home|Computation for task logo.jpg finished Fr 06 Jun 2008 16:19:32 CEST|Docking@Home|Sending scheduler request: To fetch work. Requesting 24417 seconds of work, reporting 0 completed tasks Fr 06 Jun 2008 16:19:34 CEST|Docking@Home|Started upload of 1tng_mod0011s_948_74060_5_0 Fr 06 Jun 2008 16:19:34 CEST|Docking@Home|Started upload of 1tng_mod0011s_948_74060_5_1 Fr 06 Jun 2008 16:19:36 CEST|Docking@Home|Finished upload of 1tng_mod0011s_948_74060_5_0 Fr 06 Jun 2008 16:19:36 CEST|Docking@Home|Finished upload of 1tng_mod0011s_948_74060_5_1 Fr 06 Jun 2008 16:19:36 CEST|Docking@Home|Started upload of 1tng_mod0011s_948_74060_5_2 Fr 06 Jun 2008 16:19:36 CEST|Docking@Home|Started upload of 1tng_mod0011s_948_74060_5_3 Fr 06 Jun 2008 16:19:37 CEST|Docking@Home|Scheduler request succeeded: got 0 new tasks Fr 06 Jun 2008 16:19:37 CEST|Docking@Home|Message from server: No work sent Fr 06 Jun 2008 16:19:38 CEST|Docking@Home|Finished upload of 1tng_mod0011s_948_74060_5_3 Fr 06 Jun 2008 16:19:39 CEST|Docking@Home|Finished upload of 1tng_mod0011s_948_74060_5_2 Fr 06 Jun 2008 16:20:37 CEST|Docking@Home|Sending scheduler request: To report completed tasks. Requesting 24417 seconds of work, reporting 1 completed tasks Fr 06 Jun 2008 16:20:42 CEST|Docking@Home|Scheduler request succeeded: got 0 new tasks Fr 06 Jun 2008 16:20:42 CEST|Docking@Home|Message from server: No work sent According to this messages everything went fine, but your server knows nothing about it. ____________ Gruesse vom Saenger For questions about Boinc look in the BOINC-Wiki |
||
|
ID:
4010 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Btw: I've tried Docking on my old (and lame *grin*) PIII 450 Mhz, running under Win2K. Thank you! :-) PS. I won't be crunching much with it, I mostly wanted to test D@H WUs on Win2K. ;-)) ____________ Bribe me with Lasagna!! :-) |
||
|
ID:
4012 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Sending over 500 workunits with a new complex 1abe. Have fun !
|
||
|
ID:
4015 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
I just got a bunch on the Mac and they still all fail instantly. I've seen that some others recently crunched successfully on their Macs and would appreciate any ideas. Stack trace etc. is reported on the failing tasks. This is the host's tasks page. |
||
|
ID:
4016 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Your new '1abe' work units all fail with segmentation errors on my Linux AMD computers.
|
||
|
ID:
4017 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Thanks for your feedback. We are looking at the problem.
|
||
|
ID:
4018 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
I have one Windows box that cannot receive work. It gives the following message:
|
||
|
ID:
4019 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
I had three on my Linux64 Intel Quad, they behaved well.
|
||
|
ID:
4020 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
The new WUs are running nicely on my XP 64-bit lappy. :-)
|
||
|
ID:
4022 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
I have one Windows box that cannot receive work. It gives the following message:My G5 Mac got the same thing last night, and then was apparently told to go away for 24 hours. (I’m guessing as to the interval: I recently installed BOINC v5.10.45 and it doesn’t report communication deferrals the way my previous version did.) |
||
|
ID:
4023 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Abel
Forum moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester
Joined: Sep 15 06 Posts: 30 ID: 108 Credit: 167,489 RAC: 0 |
||
|
I have one Windows box that cannot receive work. It gives the following message:My G5 Mac got the same thing last night, and then was apparently told to go away for 24 hours. (I’m guessing as to the interval: I recently installed BOINC v5.10.45 and it doesn’t report communication deferrals the way my previous version did.) As far as Power PC architecture goes, we will no longer be supporting that architecture. We don't have a power pc in our lab and haven't been able to get one. It's getting harder and harder to find those machines. Anyone have any suggestions as far getting a power pc binary? As far as the windows machine not getting work, there is definitely something wrong with that. We will look into all these things on Monday. Don't forget to vote on Monday. |
||
|
ID:
4024 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Abel
Forum moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester
Joined: Sep 15 06 Posts: 30 ID: 108 Credit: 167,489 RAC: 0 |
||
|
I just got a bunch on the Mac and they still all fail instantly. I've seen that some others recently crunched successfully on their Macs and would appreciate any ideas. Stack trace etc. is reported on the failing tasks. This is the host's tasks page. Looks like the Xeon's are being put together with the intel core 2's. There is obviously a divergence in the two. We will reevaluate the Xeons HR. |
||
|
ID:
4025 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Abel
Forum moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester
Joined: Sep 15 06 Posts: 30 ID: 108 Credit: 167,489 RAC: 0 |
||
|
I have one Windows box that cannot receive work. It gives the following message: Nothing wrong with your cpu, we indeed support this architecture. We will address this on Monday. Thanks! |
||
|
ID:
4026 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Abel
Forum moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester
Joined: Sep 15 06 Posts: 30 ID: 108 Credit: 167,489 RAC: 0 |
||
|
Your new '1abe' work units all fail with segmentation errors on my Linux AMD computers. I noticed you have two computers with identical architectures yet one with a different linux kernel (one of which is the offending seg faulter). Can you confirm that both are crashing with 1abe? It looks like only one has gotten the 1abe complex, we will send some more WU's over next week and if you could check if your other AMD gets validated that would be awesome. Thanks! |
||
|
ID:
4027 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
I'm new to Macs but the current version of OS/X includes tools allowing cross-compiling for the ppc. I created intel and ppc binaries used by another project using my Mac-intel laptop ...the same one that bus-errors on all current Docking work :-( |
||
|
ID:
4028 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Abel
Forum moderator Project administrator Project developer Project tester
Joined: Sep 15 06 Posts: 30 ID: 108 Credit: 167,489 RAC: 0 |
||
|
Hmmm, we do have an intel mac. Will give it a look. |
||
|
ID:
4029 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Your new '1abe' work units all fail with segmentation errors on my Linux AMD computers. OK will monitor it for you. ____________
|
||
|
ID:
4030 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
7-6-2008 12:07:11|Docking@Home|Message from server: No work sent 
____________
|
||
|
ID:
4035 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
We currently have 98 work units ready to send but only 1 in progress, is there no CPU type or OS type that matches these work units in order to download and work on them?
|
||
|
ID:
4038 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Hmmm, we do have an intel mac. Will give it a look. I asked jedirock about this. He has helped build Mac apps for several projects. Here is his response: Do they really need a PPC machine to compile PPC apps? Or can they do it on an intel machine? Perhaps they need a few tips? ____________ Dublin, CA Team SETI.USA |
||
|
ID:
4040 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Crosscompiling on MacOS is very easy.
|
||
|
ID:
4043 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Crosscompiling on MacOS is very easy. Thanks for your suggestions. We will try them and will contact you if we have more questions. |
||
|
ID:
4044 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Your new '1abe' work units all fail with segmentation errors on my Linux AMD computers. @ Arun, I have not gotten very many work units to test this out for you but I have found that the other computer with the same architecture but with FC3 has not given the same error as the FC6 machine. It has given, on the one WU it got, the same error most others are having, and that is 'maximum cpu time exceeded'. So it is not SEG Faulting. My FC6 machine has just gotten 4 more WU's and they all SEG faulted so I will reset the project on that computer and see if that fixes things, if it does not then I will detach and reattach to see if that works. This computer has no problems with the other 7 projects it also works on, just Docking. ____________
|
||
|
ID:
4070 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Your new '1abe' work units all fail with segmentation errors on my Linux AMD computers. Hi Conan, Thanks for your feedback. Can you please find if both the clients on FC3 and FC6 downloaded the same charmm version to execute when they got the workunits ? Thanks Arun |
||
|
ID:
4071 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
We are testing a new algorithm for checkpointing on docking Today 2 units came in, but I'm wondering if they were capable of making checkpoints. I've got the [checkpoint_debug] option enabled, but no massages were shown in the log. Unit 8548 Unit 8544 Units ran besides a climate prediction wu, and finished OK. (Vista SP1, BOINC 5.10.45, Pentium D 805) ;-) Edit: added log
____________
|
||
|
ID:
4073 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Your new '1abe' work units all fail with segmentation errors on my Linux AMD computers. OK Arun, the FC6 machine had the '1abe_mod0011sc_' work units and the FC3 machine (the one not giving seg faults) had an '1tng_mod0011sc_' work unit. So not the same type, will wait for more work units. ____________
|
||
|
ID:
4077 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Conan, thanks for your response. Actually I want to know if your client downloaded charmm_7.0_i686-pc-linux-gnu or charmm_7.0_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu when you attached to the project before downloading the wu. Thanks Arun |
||
|
ID:
4078 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Arun, I have no idea. As I currently have no work units I am unable to locate this information. I will wait for more work and if I can catch it in time (they error out in 20 odd seconds) then I may be able to get this information. ____________
|
||
|
ID:
4080 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
>> G'Day Arun, Today I have been able to get a few work units and again I had four error out on the same machine with the same error. I checked and found that the file "charmm_7.2_i686-pc-linux-gnu" and the file "charmm_7.2_i686-pc-linux-gnu-main" are currently in my Boinc/projects/docking folder. Hope this can be of help as I will have to detach this machine if I can't get it to work. It worked before the move to this new university. Perhaps I need to detach and reattach ??? Awaiting your reply, Conan. EDIT::: I have found that a work unit has downloaded to the same spec machine running FC3 and in it's Boinc folder it not only has the charmm_7.2_i686-pc-linux-gnu and charmm_7.2_i686-pc-linux-gnu-main files but also the charmm_5.8_i686-pc-linux-gnu , charmm_5.8_i686-pc-linux-gnu-main , charmm_7.0_i686-pc-linux-gnu and charmm_7.0_i686-pc-linux-gnu-main files. Could this be a reason why my FC6 machine is playing up, it has lost old and possibly needed files ?? ____________
|
||
|
ID:
4085 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
It did it again so I have detached and reattached that computer and will await new work units (probably tomorrow as I have reached my daily limit of 4 WU's, seems a pretty low daily limit to me). ____________
|
||
|
ID:
4086 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Hi Conan, Thanks for your feedback. We will use the information to figure out the problem. The problem is not because of the absence of the old files in the FC6 machine. Thanks Arun |
||
|
ID:
4090 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
I got a crashing WU (Unhandled Exception Detected) as I have pressed the show graphics button short after the start of the WU : http://docking.cis.udel.edu/result.php?resultid=9027
|
||
|
ID:
4149 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Server status says 77 units ready to send but I get this error message:
|
||
|
ID:
4151 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Server status says 77 units ready to send but I get this error message: Yeah, I'm getting these messages on all my OS's, too (Win XP 32 and 64 bit, Linux 64 bit). Guess the server will not give those WUs away. ;-) ____________ Bribe me with Lasagna!! :-) |
||
|
ID:
4152 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
|
Just completed one on Intel Ubuntu. Credits Issued. http://docking.cis.udel.edu/workunit.php?wuid=4022 |
||
|
ID:
4156 | Rating: 0
| rate:
/
|
||
Message boards : Number crunching : Test WUs
Database Error: The MySQL server is running with the --read-only option so it cannot execute this statement
array(3) {
[0]=>
array(7) {
["file"]=>
string(47) "/boinc/projects/docking/html_v2/inc/db_conn.inc"
["line"]=>
int(97)
["function"]=>
string(8) "do_query"
["class"]=>
string(6) "DbConn"
["object"]=>
object(DbConn)#98 (2) {
["db_conn"]=>
resource(198) of type (mysql link persistent)
["db_name"]=>
string(7) "docking"
}
["type"]=>
string(2) "->"
["args"]=>
array(1) {
[0]=>
&string(51) "update DBNAME.thread set views=views+1 where id=287"
}
}
[1]=>
array(7) {
["file"]=>
string(48) "/boinc/projects/docking/html_v2/inc/forum_db.inc"
["line"]=>
int(60)
["function"]=>
string(6) "update"
["class"]=>
string(6) "DbConn"
["object"]=>
object(DbConn)#98 (2) {
["db_conn"]=>
resource(198) of type (mysql link persistent)
["db_name"]=>
string(7) "docking"
}
["type"]=>
string(2) "->"
["args"]=>
array(3) {
[0]=>
object(BoincThread)#3 (16) {
["id"]=>
string(3) "287"
["forum"]=>
string(1) "2"
["owner"]=>
string(3) "114"
["status"]=>
string(1) "0"
["title"]=>
string(8) "Test WUs"
["timestamp"]=>
string(10) "1216579301"
["views"]=>
string(4) "8513"
["replies"]=>
string(2) "92"
["activity"]=>
string(20) "5.2444411929356e-102"
["sufferers"]=>
string(1) "0"
["score"]=>
string(1) "0"
["votes"]=>
string(1) "0"
["create_time"]=>
string(10) "1203649993"
["hidden"]=>
string(1) "0"
["sticky"]=>
string(1) "0"
["locked"]=>
string(1) "0"
}
[1]=>
&string(6) "thread"
[2]=>
&string(13) "views=views+1"
}
}
[2]=>
array(7) {
["file"]=>
string(63) "/boinc/projects/docking/html_v2/user/community/forum/thread.php"
["line"]=>
int(184)
["function"]=>
string(6) "update"
["class"]=>
string(11) "BoincThread"
["object"]=>
object(BoincThread)#3 (16) {
["id"]=>
string(3) "287"
["forum"]=>
string(1) "2"
["owner"]=>
string(3) "114"
["status"]=>
string(1) "0"
["title"]=>
string(8) "Test WUs"
["timestamp"]=>
string(10) "1216579301"
["views"]=>
string(4) "8513"
["replies"]=>
string(2) "92"
["activity"]=>
string(20) "5.2444411929356e-102"
["sufferers"]=>
string(1) "0"
["score"]=>
string(1) "0"
["votes"]=>
string(1) "0"
["create_time"]=>
string(10) "1203649993"
["hidden"]=>
string(1) "0"
["sticky"]=>
string(1) "0"
["locked"]=>
string(1) "0"
}
["type"]=>
string(2) "->"
["args"]=>
array(1) {
[0]=>
&string(13) "views=views+1"
}
}
}
query: update docking.thread set views=views+1 where id=287