Posts by fubared
|
1)
Message boards : Number crunching : Homogenous Redundancy? ( Message 3257 )Posted 3747 days ago by fubared processor : 0 vendor_id : GenuineIntel cpu family : 6 model : 15 model name : Intel(R) Core(TM)2 Quad CPU @ 2.40GHz stepping : 7 cpu MHz : 3150.108 cache size : 4096 KB physical id : 0 siblings : 4 core id : 0 cpu cores : 4 fpu : yes fpu_exception : yes cpuid level : 10 wp : yes flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm syscall nx lm constant_tsc pni monitor ds_cpl vmx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr lahf_lm bogomips : 6302.25 clflush size : 64 cache_alignment : 64 address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual power management: heres the cpuinfo. I have chopped out the last 3 cores for space reasons. |
|
2)
Message boards : Number crunching : Homogenous Redundancy? ( Message 3250 )Posted 3748 days ago by fubared I have a invalid WU paired against 2 P3 class systems here . I have 2 more WU that was paired against P3 class system, which would undoubtly fail also. My machine is a mildly overclocked Core class system, 9*350(3150) 2GB @ 435Mhz 64 bit linux. I have not had errors in other projects nor validation failures against other Core class systems in Docking. |
|
3)
Message boards : Number crunching : Issues with Charmm 5.07 ( Message 3158 )Posted 3756 days ago by fubared linux 5.07 is about 5700s, 2000s faster than 5.05/5.06. Thats good since I had about 800 worth of pending credits that was granted a big fat 0. Yes, I got the mail but doesn't help if the units were already crunched. |
|
4)
Message boards : Number crunching : Issues with new 5.05 Linux application ( Message 3047 )Posted 3769 days ago by fubared I started a thread about the linux x64 issues. The script has a typo in it. Open the charmm script file and you will notice it mentions the i686 file on line 22 and 25. The reason it throws an error message is it can't find the charmm i686 binary. |
|
5)
Message boards : Number crunching : charmm 5.5 x86_64 startup script error (linux) ( Message 3039 )Posted 3770 days ago by fubared Not sure but I think boinc is overwriting the modified script by re-downloading it every time it phones home. I have also tried to rename the program to i686 but it gets deleted.I guess no docking until the mods fix it. I found mine crashed too with the modded script. |
|
6)
Message boards : Number crunching : charmm 5.5 x86_64 startup script error (linux) ( Message 3034 )Posted 3770 days ago by fubared I'm not sure where to put this so here goes. There is an error with the charmm_5.5_x86_64-pc-linux-gnu script. The one that was automatically downloaded has references to the i686 app on line 22 and 25. Change it from i686 to x86_64 to make it work. I found the typo after a bit of head scratching, wondering why docking wasn't starting up. |
|
7)
Message boards : Application Info : 64-Bit / 32 bit, SSE3 and other extensions? ( Message 3031 )Posted 3771 days ago by fubared But Core Duo don't support 64bit so for maximum support, you still need 32bit apps. Oops sorry. I thought we were talking about 64 bit apps as the title suggest.My bad. |
|
8)
Message boards : Application Info : 64-Bit / 32 bit, SSE3 and other extensions? ( Message 2986 )Posted 3773 days ago by fubared What about the intel-mac application? No need to worry about old processor support. The *oldest* chips is the Core Solo/Duo. Which means that all intel Macs support the following: But Core Duo don't support 64bit so for maximum support, you still need 32bit apps. |
|
9)
Message boards : Number crunching : AMD64 ( Message 2524 )Posted 3824 days ago by fubared Oh, so its just wrapping. If thats the case, can you send work also to 'windows_amd64' platform too, please? |
|
10)
Message boards : Number crunching : AMD64 ( Message 2517 )Posted 3825 days ago by fubared Nope its got x64 app |
Next 10 posts