Posts by [B^S] sTrey
11)
Message boards : Number crunching : Time for some news ( Message 3961 )Posted 3353 days ago by [B^S] sTrey Yes re-attaching worked for me too. Also I reattached 2 other hosts successfully via BoincView. I'll try the problematic host again just for grins, after it's finished its current wu. |
12)
Message boards : Number crunching : Time for some news ( Message 3956 )Posted 3353 days ago by [B^S] sTrey Same black screensaver as others have reported. Detaching worked. Re-attaching did not work via BoincView ... for some reason it couldn't see that I had a host that was no longer attached. However when I went over to the box and used the boinc client to re-attach locally, it worked. So, you might not care about the behavior with BoincView except that it still works for other projects, and for those with farms remote admin is necessary (though there are other options than BV) All the above is on Windows XP(32) SP3 using client 5.10.45. Haven't received any mac-intel work yet. |
13)
Message boards : Number crunching : Time for some news ( Message 3940 )Posted 3353 days ago by [B^S] sTrey Another eager to put windows and mac-intel platforms on docktest@home :-D |
14)
Message boards : Number crunching : Charmm 5.04 (Windows) ( Message 2024 )Posted 3864 days ago by [B^S] sTrey Just finished my first 5.04 wu. Yes it took about half the time as before on my HT P4, and also claimed half the credit it used to claim. I assume this is what was expected. Nice optimization. Looking forward to when server-assigned credit can happen. |
15)
Message boards : Cafe Docking : Logo Poll ( Message 830 )Posted 3961 days ago by [B^S] sTrey If voting betweeen what's shown with no changes: Atomic Booty. However, also agree that Atomic Booty's design's background could be a tad less busy, and the font from Cori looks nicer. |
16)
Message boards : Number crunching : No windows work? ( Message 614 )Posted 3971 days ago by [B^S] sTrey Of course 5 minutes after I posted that, I just got work :) And I forgot about the vacation, thanks for the reminder Saenger |
17)
Message boards : Number crunching : No windows work? ( Message 612 )Posted 3971 days ago by [B^S] sTrey I can see linux crunching is being tested now, but was surprised to get "work committed to other platforms" throughout the weekend, and now into Monday. Any time frame for more Windows work? |
18)
Message boards : Number crunching : This is just a test ( Message 512 )Posted 3977 days ago by [B^S] sTrey me three ;) |
19)
Message boards : Number crunching : Too Many WUs! ( Message 324 )Posted 3978 days ago by [B^S] sTrey Yep, I see it all the time too. I can understand it happening when there's no other work queued for those projects, but it seems to do it all the time. Almost as if whatever time period you've requested is being applied PER PROJECT instead of to the client as a whole... I've never seen work requests behave any other way, at least in the last several revs of BOINC. It's always annoyed me because it tends to put BOINC in EDF when, imo, it shouldn't. Specifically, if BOINC requests work from a project (i.e. no EDF, uptime or LTD obstacles) -- and if that project has no work already queued on the host, I've never seen BOINC ask for less than a full cache of work for that project. No matter what else is queued for other projects. Assumed it was a "feature" as it's been true for so long. |
20)
Message boards : Number crunching : 5.02 completion times ( Message 294 )Posted 3979 days ago by [B^S] sTrey another P4 HT on XP, 3.0 GHz, took 3:17 so all of 10 min slower than my older P4 HT 3.2 |
Next 10 posts